I’m Out of That Game
Greetings from Covelong Beach in Chennai, where I will be sitting for the next 6 hours or so. *
Reading Sam Johnston’s piece on the future of cloud computing, I came to a resolution:
I don’t care what the definition of “cloud computing” is.
First, we’re operating under an aspect of “you don’t predict the future, you build it.” Better to wait 5 years and ask what the definitions then, rather than spend the next 5 years fretting about it.
Second, definitions from the blogosphere and marketingland don’t solve enterprise and startup and consumer use cases. Taking a security example, saying “AWS is secure” or “AWS is not secure” or “AWS is HIPAA-compliant” is meaningless until it’s tied to a very specific problem/solution set. Secure against what, particularly?
The idea is that companies will have services which correspond neatly to the definitions, at which point your choices are simple and you happily start generating purchase orders, or reach for your credit card, as the case may be. But how will you tell from such a surface view which companies will actually meet your needs from the 85 others who will ultimately plaster their marketspeak with the appearence that they do the same thing as the companies that really can meet your needs?
The devil is in the details. Or the use cases, as it were.
In theory, the definition-forging process will help guide the way in the actual “building the future” process, but what I’ve seen so far has been far too muddy to be widely useful. It’s useful to give yourself something to talk about over hors d’oeurves at a cloud computing event, but after that…
PS…not an attack on Sam’s post…just got me thinking…although I perhaps didn’t like his use of monkey analogy…
* Note to self, the next time that a previously subdued spike in craving for American food breaks over the wall and you reach for the bag of otherwise not-so-tasty Lays potato chips in the minibar fridge, you may want to check the bag to see whether said comfort food was even made in the US, and not, oh, Village Channo, Patiala, Sangrur Road, Bhawanigarh, Distt. Sangrur, Punjab. Not that I could tell a taste difference, rather it’s a matter of principle perhaps akin to the Japanese banning rice imports.



August 4th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Michael would you be cool with our republishing the post below in full, with your byline and bio obviously (plus a link back to the original URL) at http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/?
We try and do this from time to time with insightful blog posts by writers outside our immediate circle so as to introduce fresh new voices to our audience (and vice versa!)
Let us know, yes? Thank u sir…meantime have a great Monday!
Jeremy G.
–
Jeremy Geelan
Sr. Vice-President, SYS-CON Media & Events
http://sys-con.com
August 7th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
The definition is, so far as I can tell, done… it’s now broad enough to capture the relevant concepts and keep everyone happy and it’s a lot better documented than it ever was before.
The monkey analogy was more about making people realise that it really doesn’t matter what’s under the hood, so long as it works. In all likelihood what powers the cloud today is likely to be a far cry from what will power it tomorrow.
Sam